We provide an explicit taxonomy of legitimate kinds of abstraction within constitutive explanation. We argue that abstraction is an inherent aspect of adequate mechanistic explanation. Mechanistic explanations—even ideally complete ones—typically involve many kinds of abstraction and therefore do not require maximal detail. Some kinds of abstraction play the ontic role of identifying the specific complex components, subsets of causal powers, and organizational relations that produce a suitably general phenomenon. Therefore, abstract constitutive explanations are both legitimate and mechanistic.
Philosophy of Science
Boone, Worth and Piccinini, Gualtiero, "Mechanistic Abstraction" (2016). Philosophy Faculty Works. 8.
Available at: https://irl.umsl.edu/philosophy-faculty/8