Document Type

Article

Abstract

Various active-avoidance procedures and controls were run using goldfish in a shuttlebox where the CS, when used, was a sudden onset of illumination. In terms of increasing “avoid- ance” performance over days of training, CS-only, response-contingent US-only, and time- lapse groups showed significant “learning,” whereas explicitly unpaired CS and US pseudo- conditioning controls and US only (where US omission is not response contingent) did not show performance increases. The use of the pseudoconditioning procedure as a learning control for this animal seems questionable. Additionally, both classically and instrumentally trained groups showed high and comparable acquisition rates, confirming earlier findings. A negative phototaxis explanation is suggested that may account for these results.

Publication Date

May 1978

Publication Title

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

Volume

11

Issue

5

First Page

321

Last Page

323

DOI

10.3758/BF03336843

Share

COinS
 

Repository URL

https://irl.umsl.edu/psychology-faculty/40