Document Type
Article
Abstract
I consider the two venerated arguments about the existence of God: the Ontological Argument and the Argument from Evil. The Ontological Argument purports to show that God’s nature guarantees that God exists. The Argument from Evil purports to show that God’s nature, combined with some plausible facts about the way the world is, guarantees (or is very compelling grounds for thinking) that God does not exist. Both presume that it is coherent to predicate goodness (or greatness) of God. But if Peter Geach’s claim that goodness is logically attributive is cogent, then both arguments fall to the ground.
Publication Date
1-31-2018
Publication Title
Religion
Volume
9
Issue
2
First Page
43
Last Page
51
DOI
10.3390/rel9020043
Recommended Citation
Wiland, Eric, "The Problem of Evil and the Grammar of Goodness" (2018). Philosophy Faculty Works. 13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9020043
Available at:
https://irl.umsl.edu/philosophy-faculty/13
Comments
10.3390/rel9020043