Document Type
Thesis
Degree
Master of Arts
Major
Philosophy
Date of Defense
4-19-2013
Graduate Advisor
Eric Wiland, Ph.D.
Committee
Brogaard, Berit
Brunero, John
Abstract
Disagreement is ubiquitous in philosophy. Although this disagreement is sometimes easily explained, other times we find more difficult disagreement arising between epistemic peers. There are a few different ways we can react to peer disagreement in philosophy. Following Hilary Kornblith, I argue that we should suspend judgment in the face of such disagreement. Although I think this is the most rational choice, it eventually leads to an uncomfortable skepticism towards philosophical methods. I conclude that when we examine the reliability of philosophy based on its usual defenses, we find that philosophy is indeed unreliable.
OCLC Number
847739048
Recommended Citation
Wilcox, Eric Thomas, "Philosophical Disagreement and Skepticism" (2013). Theses. 239.
https://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/239