Document Type
Thesis
Degree
Master of Arts
Major
Philosophy
Date of Defense
7-27-2017
Graduate Advisor
Dr. Jon McGinnis
Committee
Dr. William Dunaway
Dr. Jon McGinnis
Dr. Lauren Olin
Abstract
Herein I argue that Amie Thomasson’s account of public artifacts is empirically vulnerable. I first identify the descriptive claims that feature in Thomasson’s argument and then outline an experimental framework in which the accuracy of those claims can be evaluated. I conclude with some brief remarks on the possible implications of my approach for Thomasson’s account, and some thoughts on whether an experimental approach to evaluating projects in descriptive metaphysics might be valuable more broadly.
Recommended Citation
Davenport, Blake, "Public Artifacts, Empirical Vulnerability and Descriptive Metaphysics" (2017). Theses. 319.
https://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/319