Document Type

Thesis

Degree

Master of Arts

Major

Philosophy

Date of Defense

7-27-2017

Graduate Advisor

Dr. Jon McGinnis

Committee

Dr. William Dunaway

Dr. Jon McGinnis

Dr. Lauren Olin

Abstract

Herein I argue that Amie Thomasson’s account of public artifacts is empirically vulnerable. I first identify the descriptive claims that feature in Thomasson’s argument and then outline an experimental framework in which the accuracy of those claims can be evaluated. I conclude with some brief remarks on the possible implications of my approach for Thomasson’s account, and some thoughts on whether an experimental approach to evaluating projects in descriptive metaphysics might be valuable more broadly.

Included in

Metaphysics Commons

Share

COinS