Document Type

Dissertation

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy

Major

Criminology and Criminal Justice

Date of Defense

4-9-2024

Graduate Advisor

Adam Boessen, Ph.D., Criminology and Criminal Justice

Committee

Marisa Omori, Ph.D.

Lee Ann Slocum, Ph.D.

Stephanie DiPietro, Ph.D.

Abstract

Despite extensive empirical evidence showing that immigration does not lead to increases in crime, the purported immigration and crime link has been used to buttress increasingly punitive immigration policies over the past few decades. While previous studies have explored the role of enforcement practices for punishment, this dissertation delves into the mechanisms through which immigrants are transformed into “criminal subjects” and the consequences for punishment at the local level. By integrating moral panic theory with research on immigration, crime, and punishment, I propose that the inflammatory language surrounding immigration in media and public discourse has punitive consequences for immigrants. Moreover, although the mass media has traditionally had a monopoly on the ability to shape collective sentiment, the rise of digital platforms and communications have transformed the public into “digitally empowered claim–makers” with significant capabilities to sculpt public sentiment and define social problems. To understand whether increased concern over immigrant criminality impacts punishment, data on newspaper coverage and Google search volumes for the term “illegal immigration” are collected, alongside county–level jail data from the entire United States. Using a series of statistical models, this study finds that Google search volumes is positively associated with the total jailed population and jailed citizens. The findings of this study suggest that the symbolic power of moral panics linking immigration to crime has far reaching implications. Moreover, the nonsignificant association between the newspaper coverage rate and jail incarceration coupled with the significant association of Google searches provide an initial indication of the significant role that “digitally empowered claim–makers” play in constructing social problems and mobilizing consensus and underscore the necessity of reconsidering the ways in which technological changes have transformed the production of public knowledge.

Available for download on Sunday, April 20, 2025

Share

COinS